(Text for those without flash or javascript) Fulcrum's professionals are experienced CPAs, MBAs, ASAs, CFAs, affiliated professors and industry specialists Our expertise encompasses damages analysis, lost profit studies, business and intangible asset valuations, appraisals, fraud investigations, statistics, forensic economic analysis, royalty audits, strategic and market assessments, computer forensics, electronic discovery and analysis of computer data.
Current Events and Commentary

Fannie Mae Crushes The Impact Of New Jumbo-Conforming Home Loans

March 2008
Library Sections:

Last week, the Department of Housing and Urban Development announced the increased lending limits allowed by the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. With much fanfare, politicians claimed great accomplishment. Listening to the politicians and many wishful-thinkers, the new lending limits will (i) provide a refinancing opportunity to numerous borrowers whose subprime loans are resetting with much higher payments, and (ii) add liquidity to real estate markets to keep real estate prices from continuing to decline. With much less fanfare, Fannie Mae quickly told the real story - not much is really going to change.

According to federal regulators, roughly half of all jumbo mortgages (those over the FHA limits) are in California. The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, signed into law in mid-February, establishes temporary increases to the loan amounts that HUD's Federal Housing Administration (FHA) can insure. Previously, FHA's loan limits were capped at $362,790, which did not do much to help borrowers in high cost real estate markets like California.

Last September, we supported increasing loan limits for conventional loans. However, we never saw increased lending limits on conventional loans as providing a major cure. This occurs because the increased lending limits increase liquidity for such loans in the secondary market, but do not solve the serious problems that caused the bubble to form in the first place. The aggressive lending that created this mess was based on the premise that increasing real estate prices would bail everyone out. No one is accepting that assumption currently. Consequently, real estate prices need to decline to the point where affordability is back to historic/sustainable levels. Fannie Mae knows that if it purchases loans based on anything other than sound underwriting, the credit markets will not repurchase the mortgages in the secondary market.

Fannie Mae is accepting only the best loans

Fannie Mae, who would be responsible for purchasing the majority of these new higher-limit loans, provided its requirements in a March 6, 2008 announcement. The new, larger loans face important restrictions that will cause most would-be borrowers to not qualify. Here is a summary of Fannie Mae’s requirements for the new jumbo-conforming loans:

  1. A first loan can be refinanced, but one cannot refinance a first and second into the new first loan. If there is a second loan, it must be re-subordinated. Since the second mortgage holders are understandably nervous, borrowers will likely have to immediately repay some substantial percentage of the second mortgage to get the second to agree to the subordination.
  2. Loans are limited to:


    • a. 90% loan to value (LTV) for principal residences purchased with a fixed rate loan,
      b. 75% LTV, and 95% first and second mortgage combined LTV (CLTV) for a principal residence refinanced with a fixed rate loan,
      c. Adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) are limited to 80%/80% (LTV/CLTV) on a purchase and 75%/90% (LTV/CLTV) on a refinance for principal residences,
      d. For second homes and investment properties, the maximum LTV/CLTV is 60% in all cases for purchases,
  3. A 700 FICO score is needed for any 80% LTV purchase loan. A 660 FICO score is needed for all other loans.
  4. The following are not eligible:
  5. a. Cash-out on refinances b. Manufactured homes c. Reverse mortgages d. Balloon payments e. Two-, three-, and four-unit properties.
  6. Borrowers must not have had any late mortgage payments in the preceding 12 months.
  7. Income must be fully documented.
  8. Maximum Debt to Income ratio (DTI) of 45%. This calculation includes the new mortgage payment, payment on other debt, property taxes, and HOA dues.
  9. A full appraisal with interior inspection is required.

California gets higher limits

If the above requirements are not a deal-killer, then the following California limits are good until the end of the 2008. At that point, FHA conventional loans revert back to $362,790. Counties are listed in order of their median Home price.

The new limits are based on 125% of each county’s median home price as of the date of the HUD announcement. The maximum loan limit is $729,750, and the minimum loan limit is $271,050.

Fourteen counties (the first fourteen counties listed) would have had higher loan limits were it not for the $729,750 limitation included in the new law. Three counties (the last three counties listed) have sufficiently low real estate prices that they qualified for the lowest limit ($271,050), and were not affected by the 125% calculation.

  Median Home Price  New FHA limit  2006 Population 
Alameda County 995,000 729,750 1,530,620
Contra Costa County 995,000 729,750 1,044,201
Marin County 995,000 729,750 256,310
San Francisco County 995,000 729,750 817,537
San Mateo County 995,000 729,750 734,453
San Benito County 790,000 729,750 57,493
Santa Clara County 790,000 729,750 1,820,176
Santa Cruz County 719,000 729,750 265,183
Los Angeles County 710,000 729,750 10,294,280
Orange County 710,000 729,750 3,098,183
Napa County 615,000 729,750 135,554
Santa Barbara County 615,000 729,750 425,710
Monterey County 599,000 729,750 425,356
Ventura County 599,000 729,750 826,550
San Diego County 558,000 697,500 3,120,088
San Luis Obispo County 550,000 687,500 267,154
Sonoma County 530,000 662,500 482,034
El Dorado County 464,000 580,000 178,689
Placer County 464,000 580,000 329,818
Sacramento County 464,000 580,000 1,415,117
Yolo County 464,000 580,000 197,530
Nevada County 450,000 562,500 99,587
Solano County 446,000 557,500 423,970
Alpine County 438,000 547,500 1,261
Mendocino County 410,000 512,500 89,669
Riverside County 400,000 500,000 2,070,315
San Bernardino County 400,000 500,000 2,039,467
San Joaquin County 391,000 488,750 680,183
Merced County 378,000 472,500 252,554
Calaveras County 370,000 462,500 45,950
Mono County 370,000 462,500 14,055
Amador County 355,000 443,750 38,320
Inyo County 350,000 437,500 18,253
Tuolumne County 350,000 437,500 56,910
Madera County 340,000 425,000 149,916
Sutter County 340,000 425,000 95,516
Yuba County 340,000 425,000 71,612
Shasta County 339,000 423,750 181,380
Stanislaus County 339,000 423,750 523,095
Mariposa County 330,000 412,500 18,356
Plumas County 328,000 410,000 20,891
Lake County 321,000 401,250 63,821
Butte County 320,000 400,000 219,101
Colusa County 318,000 397,500 21,945
Humboldt County 315,000 393,750 132,364
Fresno County 305,000 381,250 923,052
Kern County 295,000 368,750 809,903
Imperial County 260,000 325,000 174,322
Kings County 260,000 325,000 153,268
Tulare County 260,000 325,000 430,974
Tehama County 250,000 312,500 62,093
Del Norte County 249,000 311,250 29,207
Siskiyou County 235,000 293,750 45,695
Glenn County 230,000 287,500 28,018
Sierra County 228,000 285,000 3,400
Lassen County 200,000 271,050 36,223
Trinity County 200,000 271,050 14,012
Modoc County 125,000 271,050 9,747
Total Population 37,770,441

Fulcrum Inquiry performs appraisals, forensic accounting, and litigation consulting services.